Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °íÁ¤¼º °è¼Ó°¡°øÀÇÄ¡ÀÇ FRAMEWORK ÇüÅ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A SUTDY ABOUT THE SHAPE OF THE FRAMEWORK OF THE FIXED BONE ANCHORED BRIDGE USING DENTAL IMPLANTS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 36±Ç 1È£ p.104 ~ 119
±èűÕ, ÀÌ¿µ¼ö, À¯±¤Èñ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èűՠ( Kim Te-Gyun ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ¿µ¼ö ( Lee Young-Soo ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç
À¯±¤Èñ ( Yoo Kwang-Hee ) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


The purpose of this study was pertinent design of the framework of the fixed bone anchored bridge using implants in the edentulous mandible through analysis of stress distribution by the three dimensional finite element analysis method. The results were as follows: 1. The L-shaped framework was favorable in restoring the edentulous mandible by implants and fixed bone anchored bridge. 2. The structure of the framework should be designed to endure the occlusal load because of stress concentration at the most distal abutment of the framework. 3. The stress at the distal implant where cantilever starts was twice as much as that of other portions. 4. Compressive stress was generated on the framework of the mesial side of the distal implant and extrusive force was induced to the mesially positioned implants. 5. The height of vertical plate was high as possible as can be to distribute stresses concentrating bucco-lingually and labio-lingually in the framework between abutments, 6. Reinforcement of the horizontal plate thickness was needed because stress was loaded more on the horizontal plate than on the vertical plate of the framework. 7. Lengthening of the vertical plate can compensate for any limitations in horizontal plate width.

Å°¿öµå

Dental implant; Edentulous mandible; Fixed bone anchored bridge; Framework; Three tensional finite element analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed